Regret from bone-narrowing osteotomy tends to arise when the osteotomy is incomplete and when both sides of the bone are cut equally without assessing their individual conditions. The former can cause the shape to revert, and the latter is reported to lead to postoperative step-offs or asymmetry. We clarify the key distinctions to understand beforehand.
A leading cause of regret: insufficient bone cutting
By textbook standards, incomplete osteotomy is the most frequent complication in bone-narrowing surgery. It prevents sufficient bone movement, causing the narrowed shape to revert—a phenomenon called recurrence of deviation—or results in inadequate narrowing overall.[1].
For those with thin or small nasal bones, over-resection requires caution
In cases where the nasal bone is small and thin, repeating the osteotomy multiple times is reported to raise the risk of bone fragmentation or collapse. In such cases, adding contour (camouflage) before bone resection should be considered first.[2].
For the same reason, adding an osteotomy at a midline position carries risk of bone fragmentation leading to instability or worsening deformity, and is therefore not commonly performed.[3].
Cutting equally when asymmetry exists leaves a step-off
When the nasal bone is inherently asymmetric or tilted, removing the same amount from both sides may fail to move it fully to midline, leaving a step-off or bony asymmetry. Reducing the resection from the shorter side improves accuracy of midline positioning.[4].
Step-off deformity and bony asymmetry after osteotomy are positioned as findings that must always be confirmed when considering revision surgery.[5].
Short nasal bone types tend to become unstable after osteotomy
Preoperative assessment should evaluate not only the nasal bridge prominence or depression and axis tilt, but also the length of the nasal bone. Short bone types tend to become unstable after osteotomy.[6].
There can also be regret that manifests as difficulty breathing.
Beyond appearance, inaccurate bone-cutting technique can lead to bone deviation or collapse, which may result in nasal obstruction.[7]The indication for width narrowing itself is organized into closure of the roof, narrowing of wide bone, widening of narrow bone, and correction of irregularities or deviation—a technique that involves both appearance and function.[8].
What is understood about the sensation of "regret" itself.
In a general review of cosmetic surgical procedures, surgery chosen based on aesthetic expectations is considered a field where postoperative regret tends to occur due to the strength of psychological motivation.[9]However, please understand this not as data specific to bone-cutting width narrowing, but as a trend across aesthetic surgery as a whole.
There is also a systematic review regarding satisfaction questionnaires (ROE), but it does not present satisfaction data specific to bone-cutting width narrowing.[10].
Points to confirm during consultation.
The first is determining whether your nasal bone falls into the category of thin, short, or asymmetrical between left and right.[2][6][4]The second is whether an intermediate osteotomy is necessary.[3]The third is how to monitor for step-offs or effects on breathing after bone-cutting.[5][7]Since bone thickness and shape vary from person to person, which of the distinctions listed here applies can only be determined through an actual consultation.
- 1Atlas of Asian Rhinoplasty (Suh, 2018). Intermediate Osteotomy (Incomplete bone cutting is the most frequently occurring complication, leading to insufficient mobilization of bone fragments, recurrence of deviation, and poor correction of broad nasal bones)
- 2Atlas of Asian Rhinoplasty (Suh, 2018). Intermediate Osteotomy (In patients with small and thin nasal bones such as Asians, repeated bone cutting increases the risk of bone fragment fragmentation and collapse; camouflage techniques should be considered first)
- 3Structure Rhinoplasty, Vol.1. pages 0276–0300 (Intermediate bone cutting tends to cause fragmentation of the nasal bone and carries risks of destabilization, collapse, and worsening deformity; therefore, it is ordinarily performed only rarely)
- 4Atlas of Asian Rhinoplasty (Suh, 2018). Hump Reduction (Asymmetric or deviated nasal bones require asymmetric hump removal, and reducing the amount of removal from the shorter side improves the accuracy of realignment to the midline)
- 5Atlas of Asian Rhinoplasty (Suh, 2018). General Considerations (Step deformity and bony asymmetry after bone cutting are positioned as findings that must always be evaluated during revision surgery)
- 6Atlas of Asian Rhinoplasty (Suh, 2018). Preoperative Examination and Tests of the Face and Nose (Dorsum evaluation examines humps, depressions, axis deviation, and nasal bone length. Short nasal bones tend to become unstable after bone cutting)
- 7Atlas of Asian Rhinoplasty (Suh, 2018). Salient Anatomic Features of the Nose in Asian Patients (Nasal bone deviation and collapse due to inaccurate bone-cutting technique can cause nasal obstruction)
- 8Atlas of Asian Rhinoplasty (Suh, 2018). Osteotomy (The main indications for bone cutting are to close the open roof after removal of a dorsal hump, to narrow a broad nasal bone, to widen a narrow nasal bone, and to correct irregularities or deviation in the nasal bone)
- 9Jones HE, Cruz C, Stewart C, Losken A. Decision Regret in Plastic Surgery: A Summary. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open. 2023. doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000005098
- 10Rot P, Krzywdzińska S, Grab PP, Jurkiewicz D, Chloupek A, Sobol M. The Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) Questionnaire in Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024. doi:10.3390/jcm13164642