Although it may look the same as 'appearing aged,' the underlying cause changes with age. There is no one-size-fits-all solution for rejuvenation; the correct approach is to discern what is happening at your current age and reorganize your priorities accordingly.
Facial aging is not merely a skin problem. Neligan's textbook clarifies that aging changes occur across all layers — skin, superficial fat, SMAS, deep fat, and bone.[2]Morphometric research has quantitatively demonstrated that changes in facial shape begin at the early stage of20–30s.[1]In other words, waiting until sagging (skin laxity) appears to act is too late; which layer to address first changes with age.
30s: Protect your foundation and maintain skin quality
During this period when shape changes begin, the mindset of preventing loss is more suitable than making major changes. The Global Aesthetics Consensus by Sundaram et al. recommends a preventive approach combining botulinum toxin and hyaluronic acid from an early stage.[3]Preventing the establishment of expression wrinkles and supplementing areas that have begun to diminish with small amounts — careful management at this stage reduces the need for major interventions later.
40s: Supplement lost fat on a compartment-by-compartment basis
In the 40s, volume loss comes to the forefront. Sundaram et al. report that with aging, capacity is lost first from the deepest layers, and the descent of deflated fat compartments occurs in parallel with bone resorption.[3]Rohrich et al., based on the anatomical insight that facial fat exists in distinct compartments, point out that age-related 'deflation' requires precise filling by compartment, and as it progresses, compartment boundaries become visible as grooves or shadows.[4]At this age, the key is not to smooth over broadly but to target and supplement the lost compartments.
50s and beyond: Address sagging (skin laxity) and foundational changes
In later years, in addition to skin sagging (skin laxity), loosening of supporting ligaments and changes in the skeletal structure itself become significant factors. Shaw et al. discuss facial skeletal aging (bone resorption) as something that should be explicitly incorporated into rejuvenation strategy.[5]When the foundation has shrunk, merely lifting the surface is likely to appear unnatural; a realistic design combines multiple layers — supplementing the foundation with volume while restoring descent. As age increases, 'everything with one treatment' becomes more difficult, and the design of sequencing and combination becomes decisive for the final result.
- 1Cazacu CJ, Jula CR, et al. Morphology of facial aging: a shape-based quantification. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2025. doi:10.47162/RJME.66.2.10
- 2Neligan (textbook). Age-related changes across skin, superficial fat, SMAS, deep fat, and bone. Plastic Surgery.
- 3Sundaram H, Liew S, Signorini M, et al. Global Aesthetics Consensus: Hyaluronic Acid Fillers and Botulinum Toxin. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000002119
- 4Rohrich RJ, Ghavami A, Mojallal A. The Five-Step Lower Blepharoplasty / fat compartment anatomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182121618
- 5Shaw RB, Katzel EB, Koltz PF, et al. Aging of the Facial Skeleton: Aesthetic Implications and Rejuvenation Strategies. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f95b2d